
Plant maintenance software: how to choose a system that brings order to work orders, assets and costs

Plant maintenance software helps industrial organisations plan, execute, document and analyse maintenance work. It typically covers work orders, preventive maintenance schedules, an asset registry, spare parts inventory, mobile access, reporting and maintenance KPIs.
In practice, software of this class is most often referred to as a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). In larger organisations it may form part of a broader Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system, and in data-driven environments it works alongside an Asset Performance Management (APM) layer.
What is plant maintenance software?
Plant maintenance software is a system that supports the daily work of a maintenance function: from the moment a problem is reported, through the work order and the schedule, to spare parts, costs, reports and the asset’s service history.
Its primary purpose is to bring order to information that, in many plants, is scattered across spreadsheets, paper forms, email, technicians’ personal knowledge, the ERP system, technical documentation and failure records.
A typical system of this class allows an organisation to:
- create, assign and close work orders;
- plan preventive maintenance (PM);
- maintain an asset registry and equipment hierarchy;
- manage spare parts and MRO inventory;
- record labour hours, parts used and failure codes;
- handle requests raised by production;
- support technicians in the field through a mobile app;
- report maintenance KPIs such as MTTR, MTBF, PM compliance, backlog and cost per asset;
- integrate data with ERP, SCADA, DCS, IoT and an industrial data platform.
PM stands for preventive maintenance: planned inspections, checks and servicing carried out before a failure occurs. In this model the system can generate work orders automatically based on a calendar, running hours, distance travelled, a production cycle or another operating meter.
CMMS, EAM and APM – how they differ
CMMS, EAM and APM are related software categories, but they differ in scope. A CMMS brings order to operational maintenance, EAM covers the full asset life cycle, and APM focuses on asset performance, reliability and analytics.
| Dimension | CMMS | EAM | APM |
| Full name | Computerized Maintenance Management System | Enterprise Asset Management | Asset Performance Management |
| Primary purpose | Day-to-day maintenance operations | Managing the asset across its full life cycle | Optimising asset reliability and performance |
| Typical features | Work orders, PM, parts inventory, basic reporting | CMMS plus capital planning, depreciation, procurement, regulatory compliance | Condition monitoring, predictive analytics, risk-based maintenance |
| Typical users | Technicians, planners, maintenance managers | Maintenance, finance, procurement, compliance, asset management | Reliability engineers, analysts, data teams |
| Data scope | Work order history, failures, parts, labour hours | CMMS data plus financial, regulatory and life-cycle data | Sensor data, failure patterns, analytical models |
| Deployment model | Standalone system or module | Enterprise system, often tied to ERP | Analytical layer above CMMS/EAM and IoT data |
| Relationship | The operational layer | An extension of CMMS across the asset life cycle | The analytical and optimisation layer |
In practice the boundaries between these categories are fluid. Some CMMS products include EAM elements, and some EAM systems include CMMS functionality. APM, in turn, rarely replaces a CMMS – it draws on CMMS data alongside process, measurement and diagnostic data.
For an industrial plant, therefore, the key question is not “which acronym is best” but: how much maintenance and asset management scope do we actually need?
Who uses plant maintenance software?
Plant maintenance software serves several user groups: technicians, planners, maintenance managers, production, the storeroom, procurement, finance, reliability engineers and plant leadership.
Each group uses the system differently.
| Role | Typical needs |
| Maintenance technician | Work order list, instructions, parts, documentation, photos, failure history |
| Planner | Schedules, resource availability, backlog, production windows |
| Maintenance manager | KPIs, costs, priorities, PM compliance, reactive work |
| Production | Reporting breakdowns, work status, planned shutdowns, priorities |
| Parts storeroom | Minimum and maximum levels, reservations, consumption, purchase orders |
| Procurement | Suppliers, purchase orders, parts costs, ERP integration |
| Reliability engineer | Failure history, MTTR, MTBF, cause codes, trend analysis |
| Plant director | Availability, costs, risk, the impact of maintenance on production |
A well-chosen system should be more than an administrative tool for the maintenance department. It should connect technical work, planning, asset data and management information within a single process.
Core CMMS features
The core features of a CMMS are work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, an asset registry, spare parts management, mobile access and KPI reporting.
| Feature | Description | Key data or outcome |
| Work order management | Creating, assigning, executing and closing maintenance tasks | Labour hours, parts used, failure codes, timestamps |
| PM scheduling | Automatic triggering of preventive work by time, meter reading or event | PM work orders, PM compliance, inspection plan |
| Asset registry | Hierarchical database of equipment, systems and components | Nameplate data, history, documentation, criticality |
| MRO parts inventory | Managing parts used in maintenance, repair and operations | Minimum and maximum levels, stock turnover, part-to-asset links |
| Mobile access | Technicians working at the equipment on a phone or tablet | Photos, code scans, statuses, notes, signatures |
| Reporting and KPIs | Maintenance dashboards and operational analytics | MTTR, MTBF, backlog, cost, PM compliance |
| Integrations | Connections to ERP, SCADA, DCS, IoT and a data platform | Consistent data flow between systems |
Each of these features should be assessed as more than a yes-or-no checkbox. What matters is whether it fits the way the plant works, whether it is genuinely usable for technicians, and whether it produces the data needed for decisions.
Work order management
Work order management is the process of creating, approving, planning, assigning, executing, closing and reviewing maintenance tasks.
The work order is the basic operational unit in a CMMS. It records what needs to be done, on which asset, at what priority, by whom, when, using which parts and with what result.
A typical work order life cycle looks as follows:
request → approval → planning → assignment → execution → closure → review
At a minimum, the system should record:
- the asset identifier;
- a description of the problem or task;
- the work order type;
- the priority;
- the person or team responsible;
- the date raised;
- the start and completion dates;
- labour time;
- parts used;
- the failure code;
- the cause;
- a description of the work performed;
- photos or attachments;
- the closure status.
Work orders feed many maintenance KPIs: mean time to repair, first-time fix rate, PM compliance, backlog age, cost per asset and the share of planned work. If work orders are closed without reliable data, KPI reporting quickly loses credibility.
Preventive maintenance scheduling
Preventive maintenance scheduling allows work orders to be created automatically on the basis of elapsed time, distance, running hours, a production cycle or an event.
The most common PM trigger types are:
| Trigger type | Example | Typical application |
| Calendar-based | Every 30 days | Routine inspections, lubrication, safety checks |
| Meter-based | Every 500 running hours | Machines with variable utilisation |
| Event-based | After every production campaign | Batch lines, cyclical processes |
| Combined | Every 30 days or every 500 hours, whichever comes first | High-criticality assets |
A PM schedule has to balance cost against risk. Work carried out too frequently drives cost, ties up the team and can introduce unnecessary intervention into a machine. Work carried out too rarely increases the risk of breakdown, deteriorating MTBF and reactive work.
A CMMS can generate work orders automatically as an inspection date approaches or when a meter reaches a defined value. Planning then no longer depends on individual memory or manually maintained spreadsheets.
Asset registry and equipment hierarchy
The asset registry is the central database of all equipment, installations, systems and components subject to maintenance.
A well-structured asset registry should follow a hierarchy, for example:
location → site → area → system → equipment → component
For each asset it is worth holding:
- the name and identifier;
- the manufacturer;
- the model;
- the serial number;
- the installation date;
- the location;
- technical documentation;
- instructions;
- drawings;
- spare parts;
- work history;
- failure history;
- the criticality classification;
- related procedures;
- related work orders.
The asset registry is a precondition for an effective CMMS. If equipment is not described correctly, work orders will not be assigned properly, the PM schedule will be incomplete, and failure history will not be analysable.
Asset criticality classification can support Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM). In that approach the maintenance strategy depends on the asset’s function, the consequences of failure and the risk to production, safety and cost.
Spare parts and MRO inventory management
Spare parts and MRO (maintenance, repair and operations) inventory management covers the parts, materials and consumables used in maintenance, repairs and day-to-day technical operations.
A CMMS can support:
- a parts catalogue;
- part-to-asset links;
- minimum and maximum stock levels;
- reorder points;
- reserving parts against a work order;
- barcode or QR code scanning;
- consumption history;
- suppliers;
- parts costs;
- integration with procurement and ERP.
Parts availability has a direct effect on mean time to repair (MTTR). If a technician knows the cause of a failure but does not have the required part, the equipment stays down and the outage lengthens.
At the same time, excessive spare parts stock means capital tied up on the shelf. The system should therefore help balance two objectives: availability of critical parts and control of inventory cost.
Mobile access for technicians
A mobile CMMS lets technicians handle work orders directly at the equipment – on a phone, a tablet or an industrial terminal.
Mobile access matters most where technicians work in the field, across large production halls, on multi-area sites, in distributed infrastructure or on assets that are difficult to reach.
Useful mobile capabilities include:
- a list of assigned work orders;
- changing work status;
- access to documentation;
- photos and attachments;
- barcode or QR code scanning;
- time recording;
- confirmation of parts used;
- checklists;
- signature capture;
- offline working with later synchronisation.
Mobile access also affects data quality. The technician no longer has to transcribe notes at the end of a shift, and information on time, parts and work performed reaches the system much closer to the moment the work was actually done.
Maintenance reporting and KPIs
Reporting in a CMMS should cover both current work order execution and the maintenance KPIs that show reliability, efficiency, compliance and cost.
KPIs typically reported in the system include:
- MTTR – mean time to repair;
- MTBF – mean time between failures;
- PM compliance;
- schedule compliance;
- backlog;
- the share of planned versus reactive work;
- wrench time;
- first-time fix rate;
- maintenance cost per asset;
- maintenance cost per unit of production;
- spare parts stock turnover.
Reporting on its own does not improve results. Value appears when KPIs have owners and targets and lead to action: a change of schedule, a reallocation of resources, additional diagnostics, root cause analysis, updated procedures or an investment in modernisation.
A CMMS provides operational data, but the full picture usually requires combining it with production, cost and measurement data. In that model an industrial data platform and production analytics can extend reporting well beyond work order history.
How to choose plant maintenance software
The choice between a CMMS and an EAM should follow from plant size, asset count, industry requirements, integration needs, how technicians work, the available budget, and the organisation’s maturity and data quality.
It is not worth starting with the question “which system is best”. The better question is: which system best fits our maintenance process, our asset structure and the way we make decisions?
| Criterion | Questions to ask | Why it matters |
| Plant size and asset count | How many assets will be in the system? How many sites? How many users? | A small plant does not need a full EAM from day one, while a large multi-site organisation needs scalability |
| Industry and compliance | Do GMP, ISO 55001, audit requirements, electronic signatures or audit trails apply? | Regulated industries require change control, history and validation |
| Integrations | Should the system connect to ERP, SCADA, DCS, IoT, a data platform or finance systems? | Without integration, part of the data stays outside the process |
| Mobility | Do technicians work in the field? Is offline working required? | Mobile access determines adoption and the quality of execution data |
| Cost model | Does the organisation prefer operating or capital expenditure? Licensing per user, per asset or per module? | The pricing model drives total cost of ownership |
| Ease of use | What is the digital maturity of the user base? How much time can be given to training? | A difficult interface undermines adoption and data quality |
| Reporting and analytics | Which KPIs are required? Are dashboards, trends and management reports needed? | The system should support decisions, not just record keeping |
| Implementation support | Will the rollout be led by the vendor, a partner or an internal team? | This affects the timeline, the risk profile and the quality of start-up data |
| Security and access | Which roles, permissions and security policies are required? | The system reaches into infrastructure and process data, and incorrect permissions can allow unauthorised changes to schedules and asset records |
| Growth over time | Should the system serve one plant, or eventually several sites? | It is worth avoiding a solution that quickly becomes a constraint |
A sound selection process should include requirements workshops, a list of use cases, a data assessment, vendor demonstrations, a pilot, an integration analysis and a realistic implementation plan.
Cloud or on-premise?
A CMMS can run as cloud software as a service (SaaS), on the plant’s own servers (on-premise) or in a hybrid arrangement.
There is no single best deployment model. The choice depends on security policy, IT requirements, budget, the number of sites, scaling needs and offline access requirements.
| Dimension | Cloud SaaS | On-premise |
| Deployment model | Hosted by the vendor, accessed through a browser or app | Installed on the plant’s own servers |
| Cost model | Monthly or annual subscription, usually per user | Perpetual or project licence plus maintenance |
| Updates | Automatic, managed by the vendor | Manual, managed by IT |
| Customisation | Configuration within the platform | Scope for deeper customisation |
| Data control | Data in the vendor’s environment or a chosen cloud | Data in the plant’s own infrastructure |
| IT requirements | Lower on the customer side | Servers, backup, administration, IT resources |
| Scaling | Easier to add users and sites | Dependent on infrastructure |
| Offline access | Depends on the mobile app | Possible on the local network, but architecture-dependent |
| Typical fit | Small and mid-sized companies, multi-site organisations, fast rollouts | Large enterprises, environments with strict data control, isolated installations |
For many plants the cloud model shortens time to value and reduces administrative overhead. On-premise deployment tends to be chosen where specific constraints apply around data, networks, cyber security or integration with plant systems.
What does a CMMS implementation look like?
A CMMS implementation covers needs assessment, vendor selection, data preparation, configuration, training, go-live and post-launch optimisation.
A typical project at a mid-sized plant may take three to six months. In a multi-site or enterprise environment it can take twelve to eighteen months, particularly where it involves ERP integration, migration of historical data and process standardisation.
| Phase | Scope of work | Typical duration |
| 1. Needs assessment | Scope, requirements, stakeholders, budget | 2–4 weeks |
| 2. Vendor evaluation | RFP, demonstrations, pilot, references | 4–8 weeks |
| 3. Data preparation | Asset hierarchy, PM schedules, parts catalogue, history migration | 4–8 weeks |
| 4. Configuration | Processes, roles, statuses, forms, notifications, permissions | 2–4 weeks |
| 5. Training | Administrators, planners, technicians, managers | 2–4 weeks |
| 6. Go-live | Phased launch, parallel running, user support | 2–4 weeks |
| 7. Optimisation | KPI review, user feedback, process adjustment, extended integrations | Ongoing |
The biggest implementation risk usually lies not in the software but in data and processes. An incomplete asset hierarchy, out-of-date PM schedules, missing failure codes and inconsistent equipment naming can limit the value of the system from day one.
ROI from plant maintenance software
Return on investment in a CMMS should be assessed through reduced downtime, less reactive work, higher PM compliance, better technician utilisation, optimised spare parts and more reliable data for decision-making.
Implementation costs typically include:
- the licence or subscription;
- implementation services;
- data migration;
- process configuration;
- training;
- integrations;
- maintenance and support;
- infrastructure, where the system runs on-premise;
- mobile devices or code labels, where required.
Benefits can be measured through maintenance KPIs. The ranges below come from vendor implementation material and case studies, relate to individual projects and do not constitute an industry benchmark:
| Benefit category | Example measure | Indicative effect |
| Reduced downtime | Improvement in MTTR and availability | 20–50% reduction in downtime in selected cases |
| Lower maintenance costs | Maintenance cost year on year | 10–25% reduction in maintenance costs |
| Better PM compliance | Planned work completed on time | 15–30% improvement in PM compliance |
| MRO inventory optimisation | Inventory carrying cost | 5–15% reduction in inventory costs |
| Workforce efficiency | Wrench time, less administration | More technician time on technical tasks rather than administration |
| Compliance and audit | Complete history of work orders and actions | Lower risk of documentation gaps |
Payback at a mid-sized plant is often estimated at six to eighteen months, but it depends on the cost of downtime, the quality of input data, user adoption and the scope of the implementation.
It is worth avoiding ROI claims made without a baseline. Before implementation, measure the starting point: MTTR, MTBF, backlog, the share of reactive work, PM compliance, parts cost, labour cost and asset availability. Only then can the effect of the system be assessed credibly.
Integrating a CMMS with the data ecosystem
A CMMS should be part of a broader industrial data ecosystem rather than a separate work order database disconnected from production, automation, cost and condition monitoring.
Typical integrations include:
| Integration | Data flow | Value |
| ERP | Costs, purchase orders, cost centres, procurement, suppliers | Consistency across costs, parts and purchasing |
| SCADA / DCS | Alarms, statuses, process events | Automatic requests or work orders raised from alarms |
| IoT sensors | Vibration, temperature, pressure, current, equipment condition | Triggering condition-dependent work |
| Data platform | CMMS data combined with production, quality and energy data | Cross-system analysis |
| Analytics | Dashboards, trends, deviations, prediction | Better maintenance decisions |
| Storeroom and procurement | Parts levels, reservations, purchase orders | Shorter repair times and better inventory control |
| Digital work instructions | Work execution procedures, checklists, standards | More consistent work order execution |
Integration with SCADA systems and alarms can initiate work orders on the basis of technical events. Integration with sensors makes it possible to develop condition-based maintenance (CBM) and, with a longer data history and analytical models, predictive maintenance (PdM). Integration with analytics and a data platform allows failures, costs and availability to be compared against production context.
Smart RDM can act as a data and analytics layer complementary to a CMMS or EAM. It does not replace the CMMS as the system of record for work orders, but it can integrate maintenance, production, quality, energy and condition monitoring data to build a broader operational picture.
Vendor landscape 2026
The plant maintenance software market spans CMMS products for small and mid-sized plants, mobile-first solutions, enterprise EAM systems and analytical platforms that complement CMMS data.
| Vendor | Positioning | Typical segment |
| MaintainX | Cloud CMMS with a mobile-first approach covering work orders, PM and team communication | Frontline teams and production operations |
| MAPCON | CMMS for manufacturing and facility management, covering work orders, PM and parts inventory | Manufacturing and technical facilities |
| Fiix (Rockwell Automation) | Cloud CMMS with analytics and links to the industrial automation ecosystem | Industrial plants and automation environments |
| UpKeep | Mobile CMMS for maintenance teams, assets, work orders and parts | Maintenance teams working in the field |
| Limble | Cloud CMMS for mid-sized manufacturers, with an emphasis on ease of use and PM automation | Mid-sized manufacturing plants |
| SAP PM | Plant Maintenance (PM) – the historic module name; within SAP S/4HANA it sits in the Asset Management scope and is tied to ERP processes | Large enterprises |
| IBM Maximo | EAM platform for multiple industries and locations, available in cloud and on-premise models | Enterprise organisations |
| Infor EAM | EAM system with industry editions for manufacturing, utilities, healthcare and infrastructure | Multi-site organisations |
| Coast | Maintenance management software covering work orders, PM and parts | Small and mid-sized operations |
| Smart RDM | Industrial data and analytics platform, complementary to CMMS/EAM | Organisations that need to combine maintenance data with production and analytics |
This table is not a ranking. Some solutions focus on simplicity and mobility, some on enterprise integration, and some on data, analytics and the wider operational context. The choice should follow from process, scale, integration requirements and organisational maturity.
Common mistakes in CMMS selection and implementation
The most common mistake is treating a CMMS purely as an IT tool rather than as a change in the way maintenance works.
Typical problems include:
- selecting a system before the process has been put in order;
- no clear owner for asset data;
- an incomplete equipment hierarchy;
- failure codes that are too generic;
- no naming standards;
- migrating out-of-date data;
- an overly complex work order form;
- lack of adoption among technicians;
- rolling out without a mobile version despite field-based work;
- no integration with ERP, production or the parts storeroom;
- KPI reporting without defined targets;
- no performance review after go-live;
- treating the implementation as a one-off project.
A CMMS works well when it reflects the real way work gets done. The system should make work easier to carry out and to document, not simply increase the number of fields to complete.
How to start a system selection project
A plant maintenance software selection project is best started with a process workshop rather than with a list of vendor features.
A practical sequence:
- Describe the current request and work order process.
- Decide which assets are to be covered by the system.
- Define the equipment hierarchy.
- Check the quality of data on failures, parts and inspections.
- Establish user roles.
- Identify the KPIs that matter most.
- Define mobile requirements.
- Identify integrations with ERP, SCADA, DCS, IoT and a data platform.
- Set security and compliance requirements.
- Prepare the vendor selection criteria.
- Run a pilot in a selected area.
- Measure the results, and only then scale the solution.
The key question is this: which decisions and actions should the system support? If the answer is simply “we want a CMMS”, the project may end as a digital record book. If the answer concerns shorter MTTR, less reactive work, better PM compliance, tighter control of parts or credible KPIs, it becomes far easier to define the right scope and approach.
FAQ
What is plant maintenance software?
Plant maintenance software – also referred to as manufacturing maintenance software or industrial preventive maintenance software – is a system that supports the planning, execution, documentation and analysis of maintenance work in an industrial environment.
It most often covers work orders, preventive maintenance schedules, an asset registry, spare parts, mobile access, reporting and KPIs.
What is a CMMS?
A CMMS, or Computerized Maintenance Management System, is software for managing day-to-day maintenance activity.
It helps manage work orders, plan preventive maintenance, maintain an asset registry, control spare parts and report on performance.
How does a CMMS differ from an EAM?
A CMMS focuses on operational maintenance: work orders, inspections, parts and failure history.
EAM, or Enterprise Asset Management, covers a broader scope: the full asset life cycle, costs, procurement, regulatory compliance, depreciation and capital planning.
How does a CMMS differ from APM?
A CMMS manages maintenance work and documents what was done.
APM, or Asset Performance Management, uses data, analytics, condition monitoring and predictive models to improve reliability and reduce failure risk. APM usually complements a CMMS rather than replacing it.
What features should plant maintenance software have?
The core features are work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, an asset registry, an equipment hierarchy, MRO parts management, mobile access, KPI reporting, user roles and integrations with other systems.
In more advanced environments, integrations with ERP, SCADA, IoT, a data platform and analytics also matter.
How do work orders work in a CMMS?
A work order in a CMMS usually moves through a cycle of request, approval, planning, assignment, execution, closure and review.
The work order records the asset, the priority, a description of the problem, the technician, labour hours, parts, failure codes, dates, status and completion notes.
How does a CMMS handle preventive maintenance?
A CMMS handles preventive maintenance by creating work orders automatically according to a schedule.
The trigger may be a date, running hours, distance, a production cycle or an event. The system helps monitor PM compliance and reduces the risk that planned inspections are missed.
What is an asset registry in a CMMS?
The asset registry is the central database of equipment, systems and components covered by maintenance.
It holds identification data, documentation, work history, spare parts, location, criticality classification and related work orders.
How do you choose the best plant maintenance software for manufacturing?
The best software is the one that fits the scale of the plant, the number of assets, how technicians work, integration requirements, the budget, the industry and the maturity of the organisation.
Rather than selecting a system on the basis of a feature list alone, assess the work order process, data quality, mobile requirements, integrations, KPI reporting and how easily users will adopt it.
Which CMMS is the best?
There is no single best CMMS for every organisation.
A small plant may need a simple mobile system; a mid-sized manufacturer may need a fast rollout and solid PM functionality; a large enterprise may need an EAM with ERP integration, regulatory compliance and multi-site support.
Does free CMMS software make sense?
Free or freemium CMMS software can be useful for small teams that want to bring order to basic work orders and simple schedules.
The constraints are usually limits on users, assets, reports, integrations, mobility, permissions and support. At greater scale, or where audit requirements apply, a paid solution is normally needed.
How much does plant maintenance software cost?
Cost depends on the licensing model, the number of users, the number of assets, functional scope, integrations, data migration, training and support.
Common models are per-user subscription, perpetual licence, per-module pricing, freemium or an enterprise agreement. Vendor price lists change frequently, so when comparing offers it is worth analysing the total cost structure rather than individual list prices.
How long does a CMMS implementation take?
A CMMS implementation at a mid-sized plant may take around three to six months.
In a multi-site or enterprise environment the project can run twelve to eighteen months. Data preparation usually takes the longest: the asset hierarchy, PM schedules, the parts catalogue and work history.
What is the return on investment in a CMMS?
Return on investment in a CMMS is measured through reduced downtime, shorter MTTR, better PM compliance, less reactive work, better use of parts and higher data quality.
Indicative effects include lower maintenance costs, improved PM compliance, reduced downtime and optimised MRO inventory. The actual outcome depends on the starting point, the quality of the implementation and user adoption.
Can a CMMS integrate with ERP?
Yes. A CMMS can integrate with ERP across costs, purchase orders, suppliers, cost centres, inventory and procurement.
Integration reduces manual re-entry of data and keeps maintenance work, parts consumption and costs consistent with one another.
Can a CMMS connect to IoT sensors?
Yes. A CMMS can receive data from IoT sensors or from a condition monitoring platform – for example vibration, temperature, pressure or equipment status.
Such data can trigger condition-based maintenance work orders, but it requires well-defined thresholds, rules and a response process.
How does a CMMS support maintenance analytics?
A CMMS provides data on work orders, repair times, parts, costs, failures, priorities and asset history.
Combined with production and measurement data, that information can feed dashboards, trend analysis, KPIs, assessment of failure costs and decisions on maintenance strategy.
Sources
- ISO 55000 (terminology) and ISO 55001 (requirements) – asset management.
- Industry material on CMMS, EAM and APM.
- Market material on plant maintenance software and CMMS products.
- Functional documentation of selected CMMS and EAM systems.
- Industry material on preventive maintenance, work orders, MRO and KPIs.
- Smart RDM internal material on industrial data, integration, analytics and asset monitoring.

